Elon Musk , Loses Appeal of , 'Twitter Sitter' Provision .
On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire
Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities
and Exchange Commission agreement. .
On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire
Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities
and Exchange Commission agreement. .
NBC reports that the SEC requirement
would require a lawyer to review
the Tesla CEO's social media posts. .
In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement,
which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision,
unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. .
In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement,
which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision,
unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. .
The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that
claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the
market and caused shares in the company to surge.
The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that
claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the
market and caused shares in the company to surge.
The SEC deemed the tweets
"materially false and misleading,"
and in clear violation of securities laws.
At the time, Musk agreed to settle the issue
with the SEC, which included his signing off
on the so-called "Twitter sitter" provision.
NBC reports that Musk has since said
the restrictions are unconstitutional and that
he was coerced into signing the SEC agreement.
According to court papers, lawyers
representing Musk have accused the SEC
of waging an "ongoing campaign" against Musk.
Musk's legal team claim the provision , "restricts Mr. Musk’s speech even
when truthful and accurate.".
It extends to speech not
covered by the securities laws
and with no relation to the conduct
underlying the SEC’s civil action, Elon Musk legal team, via NBC.
In response, the SEC said in court papers
that Musk waived his right to appeal
when he signed off on the settlement.
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Musk is viewed in China as a favourable contrast to the stern statements from US officials, particularly during the recent visit by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
Credit: euronews (in English) Duration: 00:50Published
Elon Musk found himself in the crosshairs of controversy once again as he clashed with Australian authorities over content censorship on his platform, X. The dispute stemmed from a court order instructing X to remove video posts depicting a violent incident involving an Assyrian bishop. Musk, known for his outspoken nature, accused Australian leaders of attempting to stifle internet freedom, drawing condemnation from lawmakers.
#ElonMusk #AnthonyAlbanese #ElonMuskVsAustralia #XStabbingPosts #PostCensorship #Australia #SenatorTargeted #XDispute #SydneyChurchStabbing #CensorshipBattle #GunLawsDebate #InternetFreedom #ContentRegulation #LegalChallenge
~PR.152~ED.101~GR.122~
Australia's prime minister said Elon Musk is an "arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law" over his reluctance to remove footage of last week's Church.. Sky News
"The degree to which Twitter was simply an arm of the government was not well understood by the public. Everything was like Pravda. It was state publication, is the way to think of old..
Elon Musk plans to make X formally known as Twitter the everything app but will he able to make it financial platform without a truly decentralized cryptocurrency like Bitcoin!?
X Is Now Worth 55% Less , Than What Elon Musk Paid for It.
Musk bought X, formerly Twitter,
for $44 billion last year. .
Musk bought X, formerly Twitter,
for $44 billion last year. .
Now, he..
Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories Duration: 01:31Published
Tesla CEO Elon Musk experienced a drop in his fortune by $16.1 billion following the company's disappointing Q3 earnings report. Tesla's shares plummeted by... IndiaTimes Also reported by •BGR India
Elon Musk discussed new concepts for his social media platform, X, during a video conference. One idea discussed was incorporating dating app features into the... IndiaTimes Also reported by •BGR India
Elon Musk has been ordered by a US judge to face a lawsuit claiming that he defrauded former Twitter shareholders by not disclosing his investment in the... IndiaTimes