India  

SC grants activist Teesta Setalvad 7-day interim protection from surrender

IndiaTimes Saturday, 1 July 2023
In a temporary relief for social activist Teesta Setalvad, the Supreme Court on Saturday granted her a week's protection from arrest during a late evening hearing.The hearing was warranted after a two-judge bench were split over the grant of relief to her in a case of alleged fabrication of evidence to frame innocent people in the 2002 post-Godhra riots cases.
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 
Video Credit: Oneindia - Published
News video: Supreme Court grants interim relief to Teesta after Gujarat HC rejects bail petition | Oneindia News

Supreme Court grants interim relief to Teesta after Gujarat HC rejects bail petition | Oneindia News 02:03

The Supreme Court granted interim protection to social activist Teesta Setalvad. Her regular bail was rejected by the Gujarat High Court. Setalvad is accused of fabricating evidence in relation to the 2002 Gujarat riots. High Court had asked her to surrender immediately. In a special sitting, a...

You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

South Carolina South Carolina U.S. state

Out-of-control cargo ship sparks collision fears as US bridge is shut

A large cargo ship lost control of its engines and went nearly full throttle through a South Carolina harbour prompting the closure of one of the busiest bridges..
Sky News

SP win mirrors Akhilesh’s PDA pitch: 86% MPs are OBCs, Dalits, Muslims

Samajwadi Party, led by Akhilesh Yadav, focuses on PDA narrative with diverse MPs in Uttar Pradesh, including prominent figures like Azam Khan and ST Hasan...
IndiaTimes
Cucumbers Are Recalled in 14 States [Video]

Cucumbers Are Recalled in 14 States

Cucumbers Are Recalled , in 14 States. Fresh Start Produce Sales in Florida is recalling cucumbers over possible salmonella contamination, 'Newsweek' reports. The 14 states affected by the recall include Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. Only large, whole cucumbers are included in the recall. Mini and English cucumbers are considered safe to eat. The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture first informed Fresh Start that its product tested positive for salmonella. The FDA is conducting whole genome sequencing to determine if this sample is related to an ongoing salmonella outbreak investigation, Via recall notice. Fresh Start believes it recalled the product before it could make it into consumers' hands. Although these cucumbers are unlikely [to be found] in the marketplace, anyone with the recalled product should not consume it and should destroy and discard it or return it to the place of purchase for a refund, Fresh Start Produce Sales, via statement. Consumers should check with their retailer or place of purchase to determine whether the recalled cucumbers were sold where they shop, Fresh Start Produce Sales, via statement

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States

Delhi water crisis: Supreme Court directs Himachal Pradesh to release surplus water, Haryana to facilitate flow

Supreme Court also directed Haryana to facilitate the flow of the surplus water from Hathnikund to Wazirabad uninterruptedly to Delhi to mitigate the drinking..
DNA

SC asks neighbouring states to meet on June 5 to resolve Delhi water crisis

The water crisis in the national capital is set to see some progress right after the country elects its new government. On Monday, the Supreme Court directed the..
IndiaTimes

‘Sheer mockery of courts’: SC slams HC shield for rowdy MLA

The Supreme Court on Monday described the Andhra Pradesh High Court's order providing interim protection from arrest to Macherla MLA Pinnelli Ramakrishna Reddy..
IndiaTimes

Haryana govt to appeal in SC after HC quashes policy of additional marks under socioeconomic criteria

After the High Court quashed the appeal of the Haryana government, which prescribed socioeconomic criteria for granting additional marks to certain classes of..
IndiaTimes
EPA's New Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water Could Be Upended by the Supreme Court [Video]

EPA's New Limits on PFAS in Drinking Water Could Be Upended by the Supreme Court

EPA's New Limits on PFAS , in Drinking Water Could Be , Upended by the Supreme Court. 'Newsweek' reports that the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case against new water rules put in place by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 'Newsweek' reports that the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a case against new water rules put in place by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In April, new national limits were placed on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the nation's drinking water, otherwise known as PFAS. . Also known as "forever chemicals," PFAS have been linked to a number of health concerns, including cancer. According to the EPA, of the 66,000 public drinking water systems impacted by the new limits, an estimated 6% to 10% will need to make updates to meet the new standards. According to San Francisco, the EPA's new "narrative" regulations fail to meet the Clean Water Act's requirement to lay out clear restrictions. The lawsuit headed to the Supreme Court accuses the EPA of setting vague rules without quantifiable standards. Rather than specify pollutant limits that tell the permitholder how much they need to control their discharges as required by the CWA, these prohibitions effectively tell permitholders nothing more than not to cause 'too much' pollution, Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. These generic water quality terms expose San Francisco and numerous permitholders nationwide to enforcement actions while failing to tell them how much they need to limit or treat their discharges to comply with the Act, Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. We simply want to know in advance what requirements apply to us, and we want the EPA to fulfil its duty under the Clean Water Act to determine those requirements. , Lawyers representing San Francisco, via 'Newsweek'. 'Newsweek' points out that the Supreme Court has sided against the EPA in the past, most recently in 2022 when it ruled 6-3 against the Biden administration's climate agenda. . 'Newsweek' points out that the Supreme Court has sided against the EPA in the past, most recently in 2022 when it ruled 6-3 against the Biden administration's climate agenda.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published