India  

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:31s - Published
SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase , for Offering Unregistered Securities.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla has ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) lawsuit against Coinbase can proceed, The Verge reports.

.

The SEC has sufficiently pleaded that Coinbase operates as an exchange, as a broker, and as a clearing agency under the federal securities laws, , U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling.

... and, through its Staking Program, engages in the unregistered offer and sale of securities, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling.

The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto.

.

The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto.

.

The ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling.

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling.

.

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling.

.

Early motions like ours against a government agency are almost always denied.

, Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X.

But clarity is the ultimate goal and today’s decision continues us on that path, Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X.

Looking ahead, we remain confident in our legal arguments, we look forward to proving we’re right, , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X.

... we are eager for the opportunity to take discovery from the SEC for the first time, and we appreciate the Court’s continued consideration of our case.

, Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X


You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Coinbase American digital asset exchange company


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Government agency overseeing stock changes

Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision [Video]

Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision

Elon Musk , Loses Appeal of , 'Twitter Sitter' Provision . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . NBC reports that the SEC requirement would require a lawyer to review the Tesla CEO's social media posts. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC deemed the tweets "materially false and misleading," and in clear violation of securities laws. At the time, Musk agreed to settle the issue with the SEC, which included his signing off on the so-called "Twitter sitter" provision. NBC reports that Musk has since said the restrictions are unconstitutional and that he was coerced into signing the SEC agreement. According to court papers, lawyers representing Musk have accused the SEC of waging an "ongoing campaign" against Musk. Musk's legal team claim the provision , "restricts Mr. Musk’s speech even when truthful and accurate.". It extends to speech not covered by the securities laws and with no relation to the conduct underlying the SEC’s civil action, Elon Musk legal team, via NBC. In response, the SEC said in court papers that Musk waived his right to appeal when he signed off on the settlement.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders [Video]

Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders

Trump’s Social Media Company , Sues Co-Founders. Trump Media & Technology Group filed a lawsuit against co-founders Wesley Moss and Andrew Litinsky on March 24, ABC News reports. The suit came two days before shareholders approved a merger that allowed the company to begin trading on the Nasdaq. The lawsuit alleges that the two men "failed spectacularly" to lead the company and made "reckless and wasteful decisions" that resulted in "significant damage.". Trump Media wants the co-founders to give up their shares of the company, among other things. . TMTG has been forced to file this action to remedy the harm inflicted upon it by two faithless fiduciaries and a company they own -- Wesley Moss, Andrew Litinsky, and [United Atlantic Ventures] -- and to halt their ongoing attempts to do even more damage, Via lawsuit. Moss and Litinsky's company, United Atlantic Ventures, owns 5.5% of Trump Media, according to the SEC. That amounts to 7,525,000 shares which are worth about $388 million. Donald Trump's stake in the company is currently valued at over $4 billion. Since going public last week, the stock has been very volatile. . At one time, shares peaked over $79. On April 1, they plunged by 21%. Shares recovered slightly on April 2

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published
SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits [Video]

SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits

SEC's New , Climate Disclosure Rules , Facing Multiple Lawsuits. 'Newsweek' reports that both industry and environmental groups have legally challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission over new rules. . The new rules require some businesses to disclose information about climate risks, including direct greenhouse gas emissions and risks from extreme weather. The SEC rules, which were approved on March 6 by a 3-2 vote, also require companies to provide investors with context on how those companies plan on managing those risks. Some requirements were pared back prior to the rules being approved. Those rules include reporting on Scope 3 emissions which relate to the company's supply chain. In response to the new rules, two fossil fuel producing companies filed lawsuits accusing the SEC of burdening companies and exposing them to potential litigation. 19 state attorney generals have also filed lawsuits claiming that the new rules exceed the SEC's legal authority. On the other side, environmental groups the Sierra Club Foundation and Earthjustice announced their own lawsuits accusing the SEC of watering down rules to protect investors. Sierra Club has millions of members and supporters who have investments in the market. It's really critical that we have access to information about climate risks that may be faced by the kinds of entities that we would hope to invest in, Andres Restrepo, Sierra Club Senior Attorney, via Newsweek. 'Newsweek' reports that the SEC rules were meant to take effect in 2026, however, the legal challenges are likely to result in delays. The new rules come as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated plans to restrict the regulatory authority of environmental enforcement agencies.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

Katherine Polk Failla Katherine Polk Failla American judge (born 1969)


Paul Grewal American judge


Court Court Judicial institution with authority to resolve legal disputes

China-Based Hackers Hit With Sanctions and Indictments Over Cyber Attacks [Video]

China-Based Hackers Hit With Sanctions and Indictments Over Cyber Attacks

China-Based Hackers , Hit With Sanctions and Indictments , Over Cyber Attacks. ABC reports that the United States has sanctioned hackers based in China over alleged attacks on critical U.S. infrastructure. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, a state-sponsored front company has provided cover for multiple cyber attacks on U.S. infrastructure. . Sanctions by the U.S. and the United Kingdom have targeted representatives of Wuhan Xiaoruizhi Science and Technology Company Ltd. (Wuhan XRZ). The U.S. Treasury Department alleges that Wuhan XRZ acts as a China-based Ministry of State Security (MSS) front company. . ABC reports that the allegations include malicious cyber operations that include the 2020 spear phishing operation against the U.S. Naval Academy. . ABC reports that the allegations include malicious cyber operations that include the 2020 spear phishing operation against the U.S. Naval Academy. . On March 25, the U.S. Justice Department indicted seven individuals on charges stemming from their alleged involvement with these malicious operations. On March 25, the U.S. Justice Department indicted seven individuals on charges stemming from their alleged involvement with these malicious operations. The Justice Department will not tolerate efforts by the Chinese government to intimidate Americans who serve the public, silence the dissidents who are protected by American laws, or steal from American businesses, Merrick Garland, Attorney General statement, via ABC. This case serves as a reminder of the ends to which the Chinese government is willing to go to target and intimidate its critics, including launching malicious cyber operations aimed at threatening the national security of the United States and our allies, Merrick Garland, Attorney General statement, via ABC. ABC reports that court documents show that the hackers targeted politicians and other prominent officials with "tracking links.". The Conspirators used this method to enable more direct and sophisticated targeting of recipients' home routers and other electronic devices, including those of high-ranking U.S. government officials and politicians and election campaign staff from both major U.S. political parties, Court documents, via ABC. The Conspirators used this method to enable more direct and sophisticated targeting of recipients' home routers and other electronic devices, including those of high-ranking U.S. government officials and politicians and election campaign staff from both major U.S. political parties, Court documents, via ABC

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published