India  

Lawyers for Musk and Twitter Argue Over the Exchange of Information

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:30s - Published
Lawyers for Musk and Twitter Argue Over the Exchange of Information

Lawyers for Musk and Twitter Argue Over the Exchange of Information

Lawyers for Musk , and Twitter Argue , Over the Exchange of Information.

On September 27, a preliminary hearing took place in Twitter's legal case to force billionaire Elon Musk to complete his $44 billion takeover.

Associated Press reports that the preliminary hearing comes three weeks before the actual trial is scheduled to begin.

Associated Press reports that the preliminary hearing comes three weeks before the actual trial is scheduled to begin.

In April, Musk agreed to buy Twitter and take it private.

In July, Musk backed out of the deal, claiming that Twitter had failed to provide adequate information regarding the number of fake accounts on the social media platform.

.

In July, Musk backed out of the deal, claiming that Twitter had failed to provide adequate information regarding the number of fake accounts on the social media platform.

.

Also in July, former head of security for Twitter Peiter Zatco filed a whistleblower complaint with Congress, the Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

.

AP reports that the complaint outlines a number of accusations against Twitter.

.

Those accusations include claims that senior executives made false claims and misleading statements about Twitter's security, privacy and integrity.

Those accusations include claims that senior executives made false claims and misleading statements about Twitter's security, privacy and integrity.

Attorneys representing Twitter are seeking records of all communications among Musk, his advisors and co-investors that have involved Zatko since December.

Meanwhile, lawyers for Musk are looking to obtain more data and claim Twitter has withheld too much information as "privileged" or confidential.

Meanwhile, lawyers for Musk are looking to obtain more data and claim Twitter has withheld too much information as "privileged" or confidential.

Attorneys for Musk have also accused Twitter of withholding information on user metrics.


You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Twitter, Inc. Twitter, Inc. American defunct social media company

Elon Musk sued by ex-Twitter executives including Parag Agarwal for $128 million  | Oneindia News [Video]

Elon Musk sued by ex-Twitter executives including Parag Agarwal for $128 million | Oneindia News

Former Twitter executives, including ex-CEO Parag Agrawal, have filed a lawsuit against tech mogul Elon Musk, seeking over $128 million in combined unpaid severance. The lawsuit, filed on Monday in federal court in San Francisco, is the latest in a string of legal challenges faced by Musk since he acquired the social media giant for $44 billion in October 2022, subsequently renaming it X. #X #ParagAgrawal #ElonMusk #Twitter ~PR.151~ED.101~GR.125~HT.96~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 02:19Published

Elon Musk Elon Musk South Africa–born businessman (born 1971)

Elon Musk targets Australian senator, gun laws in deepening dispute over X attack posts | Oneindia [Video]

Elon Musk targets Australian senator, gun laws in deepening dispute over X attack posts | Oneindia

Elon Musk found himself in the crosshairs of controversy once again as he clashed with Australian authorities over content censorship on his platform, X. The dispute stemmed from a court order instructing X to remove video posts depicting a violent incident involving an Assyrian bishop. Musk, known for his outspoken nature, accused Australian leaders of attempting to stifle internet freedom, drawing condemnation from lawmakers. #ElonMusk #AnthonyAlbanese #ElonMuskVsAustralia #XStabbingPosts #PostCensorship #Australia #SenatorTargeted #XDispute #SydneyChurchStabbing #CensorshipBattle #GunLawsDebate #InternetFreedom #ContentRegulation #LegalChallenge ~PR.152~ED.101~GR.122~

Credit: Oneindia    Duration: 02:00Published
Elon Musk accuses Australia of censorship [Video]

Elon Musk accuses Australia of censorship

Credit: FRANCE 24 English    Duration: 04:45Published

Elon Musk and Australian PM row over stabbing video: What's going on?

Australia's prime minister said Elon Musk is an "arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law" over his reluctance to remove footage of last week's Church..
Sky News
Bolsonaro supporters hail Elon Musk at Rio rally [Video]

Bolsonaro supporters hail Elon Musk at Rio rally

Credit: FRANCE 24 English    Duration: 01:26Published

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Government agency overseeing stock changes

Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders [Video]

Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders

Trump’s Social Media Company , Sues Co-Founders. Trump Media & Technology Group filed a lawsuit against co-founders Wesley Moss and Andrew Litinsky on March 24, ABC News reports. The suit came two days before shareholders approved a merger that allowed the company to begin trading on the Nasdaq. The lawsuit alleges that the two men "failed spectacularly" to lead the company and made "reckless and wasteful decisions" that resulted in "significant damage.". Trump Media wants the co-founders to give up their shares of the company, among other things. . TMTG has been forced to file this action to remedy the harm inflicted upon it by two faithless fiduciaries and a company they own -- Wesley Moss, Andrew Litinsky, and [United Atlantic Ventures] -- and to halt their ongoing attempts to do even more damage, Via lawsuit. Moss and Litinsky's company, United Atlantic Ventures, owns 5.5% of Trump Media, according to the SEC. That amounts to 7,525,000 shares which are worth about $388 million. Donald Trump's stake in the company is currently valued at over $4 billion. Since going public last week, the stock has been very volatile. . At one time, shares peaked over $79. On April 1, they plunged by 21%. Shares recovered slightly on April 2

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published
SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities [Video]

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase , for Offering Unregistered Securities. U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla has ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) lawsuit against Coinbase can proceed, The Verge reports. . The SEC has sufficiently pleaded that Coinbase operates as an exchange, as a broker, and as a clearing agency under the federal securities laws, , U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. ... and, through its Staking Program, engages in the unregistered offer and sale of securities, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto. . The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto. . The ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling. . Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling. . Early motions like ours against a government agency are almost always denied. , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. But clarity is the ultimate goal and today’s decision continues us on that path, Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. Looking ahead, we remain confident in our legal arguments, we look forward to proving we’re right, , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. ... we are eager for the opportunity to take discovery from the SEC for the first time, and we appreciate the Court’s continued consideration of our case. , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits [Video]

SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits

SEC's New , Climate Disclosure Rules , Facing Multiple Lawsuits. 'Newsweek' reports that both industry and environmental groups have legally challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission over new rules. . The new rules require some businesses to disclose information about climate risks, including direct greenhouse gas emissions and risks from extreme weather. The SEC rules, which were approved on March 6 by a 3-2 vote, also require companies to provide investors with context on how those companies plan on managing those risks. Some requirements were pared back prior to the rules being approved. Those rules include reporting on Scope 3 emissions which relate to the company's supply chain. In response to the new rules, two fossil fuel producing companies filed lawsuits accusing the SEC of burdening companies and exposing them to potential litigation. 19 state attorney generals have also filed lawsuits claiming that the new rules exceed the SEC's legal authority. On the other side, environmental groups the Sierra Club Foundation and Earthjustice announced their own lawsuits accusing the SEC of watering down rules to protect investors. Sierra Club has millions of members and supporters who have investments in the market. It's really critical that we have access to information about climate risks that may be faced by the kinds of entities that we would hope to invest in, Andres Restrepo, Sierra Club Senior Attorney, via Newsweek. 'Newsweek' reports that the SEC rules were meant to take effect in 2026, however, the legal challenges are likely to result in delays. The new rules come as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated plans to restrict the regulatory authority of environmental enforcement agencies.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Bitcoin Rallies on Hopes of Renewed Interest Among Mainstream Investors [Video]

Bitcoin Rallies on Hopes of Renewed Interest Among Mainstream Investors

Bitcoin Rallies, on Hopes of Renewed Interest , Among Mainstream Investors. On March 4, the price of Bitcoin broke $65,000, bringing it closer to returning to an all-time high reached in November 2021. NBC reports that the latest rally has been driven by hopes that the launch of bitcoin exchange- traded funds will expand bitcoin's pool of buyers. . In 2024, the cryptocurrency has gained over 48%, rapidly approaching its record intra-day all-time high of over $68,000. In January, Bitcoin ETFs were first approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). . The SEC said the approval of the ETFs were meant to make it easier for investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin without having to actually own the digital coins. NBC reports that the world of crypto is also banking on a potential rally following a technical event known as "halving" scheduled to occur in April. This event will see the rate of supply for new bitcoin to decline, which could cause the value of the cryptocurrency to increase if demand remains unchanged. Some mainstream investment experts have still urged caution when it comes to investing in the controversial cryptocurrency. With equities, you own a share of a company that produces goods or services, and many also pay dividends. With bonds, you get a stream of interest payments, Vanguard statement, via NBC. Commodities are real assets that meet consumption needs, have inflation- hedging properties, and can play a role in certain portfolios, Vanguard statement, via NBC. While crypto has been classified as a commodity, it’s an immature asset class that has little history, no inherent economic value, no cash flow, and can create havoc within a portfolio, Vanguard statement, via NBC

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:32Published

Federal Trade Commission Federal Trade Commission United States government agency

FTC to Decide Whether Noncompete Agreements Should Be Banned [Video]

FTC to Decide Whether Noncompete Agreements Should Be Banned

FTC to Decide , Whether Noncompete Agreements , Should Be Banned. After receiving over 26,000 public comments about the issue, the Federal Trade Commission is set to deliver its verdict on April 30, NPR reports. . The commission said that if approved, the final rule "would generally prevent most employers from using noncompete clauses.". The commission said that if approved, the final rule "would generally prevent most employers from using noncompete clauses.". Approximately one in five Americans, spanning minimum wage workers to CEOs, are subject to noncompete agreements, the FTC estimates. . The Biden administration says that these types of agreements hurt workers by decreasing wages. The White House also argues that these agreements harm the U.S. economy because entrepreneurship isn't allowed to freely flourish. . FTC Chair Lina M. Khan issued a statement when the proposed ban was initially introduced. The freedom to change jobs is core to economic liberty and to a competitive, thriving economy, FTC Chair Lina M. Khan, via statement. Noncompetes block workers from freely switching jobs, depriving them of higher wages and better working conditions, and depriving businesses of a talent pool that they need to build and expand, FTC Chair Lina M. Khan, via statement. Businesses argue that noncompete agreements are essential for safeguarding investments and proprietary information. Those businesses also question whether the agency has the power "to regulate such agreements," NPR reports. . If the FTC votes to issue a final rule, enforcement wouldn't occur for 180 days, and legal challenges would likely ensue.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Jon Stewart Says Apple Asked Him Not to Interview FTC Chair Lina Khan on "The Problem" | THR News Video [Video]

Jon Stewart Says Apple Asked Him Not to Interview FTC Chair Lina Khan on "The Problem" | THR News Video

Jon Stewart is saying that Apple asked him not to talk to the Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan on his former Apple show 'The Problem with Jon Stewart.' Khan, who became chair of the FTC in 2021, has made a name for herself for being an outspoken critic of the business practices of Big Tech companies like Amazon and Meta and has been praised by both Democrats and Republicans for her antitrust efforts. Khan was a guest on Monday's episode of Comedy Central's 'The Daily Show,' where Stewart made the revelation.

Credit: The Hollywood Reporter    Duration: 01:47Published