2008 Malegaon blast case: Court says no reliable proof to warrant conviction; here's why all 7 accused were let off

A special NIA court acquitted Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Prasad Purohit, and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, citing lack of evidence and procedural lapses. The court stated that the UAPA could not be applied due to defective sanction orders and noted the prosecution failed to prove key evidence. Families of the deceased will receive compensation.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
You Might Like💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions
|
![]()
Diddy Denied Bail After Cassie Ventura’s Legal Team Urges Court to Keep Him in Custody
Credit: What's Trending Duration: 02:25Published
|
![]()
Hasina Sentenced:6-Months Jail After Viral “License to Kill” Audio | First Verdict Since 2024 Escape
Credit: Oneindia Duration: 02:55Published
|
Related news from verified sources
All seven accused acquitted in 2008 Malegaon blast case by NIA courtnewKerala.com Also reported by •IndiaTimes •Mid-Day •DNA |
Explosive in house or on bike? Malegaon blast judgement flags gap in probe; raises torture concernsA special NIA court's acquittal in the 2008 Malegaon blast case has revealed significant contradictions between the ATS and NIA investigations. The court cited...IndiaTimes |
'No evidence to prove that Pragya Thakur owned motorcycle': All Malegaon bomb blast accused acquitted; here's what Special NIA court observedA special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Shrikant Prasad Purohit,...IndiaTimes |