2008 Malegaon blast case: Court says no reliable proof to warrant conviction; here's why all 7 accused were let off

A special NIA court acquitted Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Prasad Purohit, and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, citing lack of evidence and procedural lapses. The court stated that the UAPA could not be applied due to defective sanction orders and noted the prosecution failed to prove key evidence. Families of the deceased will receive compensation.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
You Might Like💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions
|
![]()
Terrorism case against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara adjourned by UK court
Credit: euronews (in English) Duration: 01:10Published
|
![]()
‘Could End in Jail’: Netanyahu Faces BRIBERY Trial Marathon|Court Orders PM to Testify 3 Days a Week
Credit: Oneindia Duration: 03:03Published
|
![]()
Diddy Denied Bail After Cassie Ventura’s Legal Team Urges Court to Keep Him in Custody
Credit: What's Trending Duration: 02:25Published
|
Related news from verified sources
'No evidence to prove that Pragya Thakur owned motorcycle': All Malegaon bomb blast accused acquitted; here's what Special NIA court observedA special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt. Col. Shrikant Prasad Purohit,...IndiaTimes |