Bengal differs with TN in SC, asserts governor's discretionary powers on bills
Wednesday, 3 September 2025 () In a Supreme Court hearing regarding the powers of governors, West Bengal argued that governors possess some discretionary authority under Article 200 of the Constitution when dealing with bills. This stance differs from Tamil Nadu's position, which asserts governors are bound by the advice of the council of ministers.
The Supreme Court questioned Tamil Nadu's defense of deemed assent for delayed bills, raising concerns about potentially overstepping into the governor's role... IndiaTimes
The West Bengal polls are shaping into a fierce political contest. As the BJP mounts a serious challenge to Mamata Banerjee’s TMC, the issues of jobs, development, and security dominate the narrative. The West Bengal polls also highlight questions of illegal migration, Bengali Asmita, and governance failures. From Sandeshkhali to RG Kar, and from communal riots to infrastructure apathy, the West Bengal polls will decide whether voters stick with TMC or seek change with BJP. Oneindia’s Pankaj Mishra brings you ground voices with Upamanyu Bhattacharya, a BJP leader from the state.
#WestBengalPolls
#BJPvsTMC
#BengalElections2025
#PoliticalBattle
#OneindiaVoices
~HT.178~GR.282~GR.124~PR.100~
India's school education system demonstrates progress with near-universal elementary access, but faces challenges in secondary enrolment, especially among boys... IndiaTimes
Mexico’s new Supreme Court takes office amid legitimacy concerns
Mexico inaugurated a new Supreme Court on Monday, the first to emerge from a landmark judicial reform that introduced popular elections for top judges in the country’s history.
READ MORE : http://www.euronews.com/2025/09/02/mexicos-new-supreme-court-takes-office-amid-legitimacy-concerns
Let the pictures do the talking: subscribe to No Comment
No Comment is brought to you by euronews, the most watched news channel in Europe.
Credit: euronews (in English) Duration: 01:00Published
A U.S. appeals court has ruled that many of President Trump’s global tariffs were imposed illegally, dealing a major setback to his trade agenda. The 7-4 ruling found Trump overstepped his authority by using emergency powers to levy duties, though tariffs remain in place until October pending further appeal. The decision casts uncertainty over deals with the EU, UK, and other partners, raising questions about billions collected. Critics warn of a “global diplomatic embarrassment” as Trump vows to fight back in the Supreme Court.
#Trump #Tariffs #TradeWar #USCourt #EU #UK #AppealsCourt #SupremeCourt #GlobalTrade #DiplomaticEmbarrassment #USPolitics #BreakingNews #TradeDeals #TariffTrouble #TrumpTariffs #WorldStage #EconomicPolicy #GlobalEconomy #CourtRuling #TariffWar #SteelTariffs #AluminumTariffs #TradeNews #WhiteHouse #USChinaRelations #BidenVsTrump #Trump2024 #USLaw #TradeStrategy #TariffCrisis
~HT.318~ED.346~
In a Supreme Court hearing regarding the powers of governors, West Bengal argued that governors possess some discretionary authority under Article 200 of the... IndiaTimes
The Supreme Court has instructed five social media influencers, including Samay Raina, to publicly apologize for mocking individuals with disabilities. This... IndiaTimes
The Supreme Court of India has cautioned about the escalating environmental crisis in Himachal Pradesh, attributing it to irresponsible human activities. The... IndiaTimes