United States: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Requires Employees Establish Only "Some Harm" As A Result Of Transfer, Rejecting Lower Court Ruling That Harm Must Be "Significant" To Constitute Discrimination - Ford & Harrison LLP
Thursday, 25 April 2024 () Can an employer be sued by an employee for an alleged discriminatory transfer? The answer had been yes, so long as the transfer was based on a discriminatory reason and resulted...
Please join me and a group of really fantastic co-hosts this Thursday at 9:40 AM on YouTube, Rumble, and Twitter as we do livestream coverage of the oral arguments for Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court case involving the question of presidential immunity. Itβs been a long and winding legal...
Explore a pivotal legal battle in 'Chapman v. US: The Landlord,' the latest installment in our 'Legal Landmark Shorts' series. This brief yet insightful video delves..
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments over whether the Biden administration has the power to penalize hospitals that fail to provide abortions in emergency situations. The case, Moyle v. United..
On Monday, the United Kingdom Parliament passed the contentious Rwanda deportation bill, marking a significant step toward its enactment into law. Despite months of opposition from various quarters..
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII of the... Mondaq