India  

Nvidia Fined $5.5 Million for Not Properly Disclosing Sales to Crypto Miners

Video Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories - Duration: 01:30s - Published
Nvidia Fined $5.5 Million for Not Properly Disclosing Sales to Crypto Miners

Nvidia Fined $5.5 Million for Not Properly Disclosing Sales to Crypto Miners

Nvidia Fined $5.5 Million , for Not Properly Disclosing Sales to Crypto Miners.

IGN reports that on May 6, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)... .

... announced Nvidia has been fined for "inadequate disclosures" pertaining to the amount of graphics cards that were purchased by crypto miners.

The SEC says Nvidia didn't reveal that crypto mining was "a significant element of its material revenue growth" for the 2018 fiscal year.

The SEC says Nvidia didn't reveal that crypto mining was "a significant element of its material revenue growth" for the 2018 fiscal year.

NVIDIA’s disclosure failures deprived investors of critical information to evaluate the company’s business in a key market, Kristina Littman, Head of SEC's Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, via press release.

All issuers, including those that pursue opportunities involving emerging technology, must ensure that their disclosures are timely, complete, and accurate, Kristina Littman, Head of SEC's Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, via press release.

IGN reports that there was a gaming GPU shortage in 2018 because of the high demand by crypto miners.

When there was another GPU shortage in 2020, IGN reports Nvidia released CMP graphics cards for crypto mining.

.

While the gaming GPU supply has seemingly improved lately, prices are still inflated.

The Verge reports that as part of the SEC settlement, the company agrees to properly disclose information in the future.

But Nvidia hasn't admitted to any wrongdoing as part of the SEC's initial charges


You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Nvidia Nvidia American multinational technology company

OpenAI and Microsoft Make Plans for $100 Billion Data Center [Video]

OpenAI and Microsoft Make Plans for $100 Billion Data Center

OpenAI and Microsoft Make Plans , for $100 Billion Data Center. According to The Information, the two companies are planning to build a data center that would house an AI supercomputer called "Stargate," Reuters reports. According to The Information, the two companies are planning to build a data center that would house an AI supercomputer called "Stargate," Reuters reports. The project, which could cost $100 billion or more, is reportedly set to launch in 2028. The tentative cost is roughly 100 times more expensive than some of the biggest data centers that exist today. . Demand for AI data centers has increased due to the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence technology, Reuters reports. . This is because traditional data centers aren't as capable of handling the advanced tasks that AI requires. . Several supercomputers would be built across five phases. "Stargate" would be launched in the fifth phase, while a smaller supercomputer would be launched in the fourth phase, tentatively around 2026. Microsoft and OpenAI are reportedly in the third phase currently. We are always planning for the next generation of infrastructure innovations needed to continue pushing the frontier of AI capability, Microsoft spokesperson, to Reuters . The cost for the next two phases largely revolves around acquiring expensive AI chips. In March, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said that the newest "Blackwell" B200 AI chip will cost between $30,000 and $40,000

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Mumbai Becomes Asia's Billionaire Capital on Global Rich List [Video]

Mumbai Becomes Asia's Billionaire Capital on Global Rich List

Mumbai Becomes Asia's , Billionaire Capital , on Global Rich List. NBC reports that Mumbai has become the Asian capital with the highest number of billionaires, dethroning Beijing at the top of the exclusive list. . NBC reports that Mumbai has become the Asian capital with the highest number of billionaires, dethroning Beijing at the top of the exclusive list. . According to the Hurun Research Institute's global rich list, India's financial capital registered 92 billionaires in 2024. . Beijing comes in just below Mumbai with 91 billionaires, and Shanghai rounds out the top three with a total of 87 billionaires. Beijing comes in just below Mumbai with 91 billionaires, and Shanghai rounds out the top three with a total of 87 billionaires. The top of the list globally is New York with 119 billionaires, followed by London with a total of 97. . The top of the list globally is New York with 119 billionaires, followed by London with a total of 97. . According to the report, there are a total of 3,279 billionaires globally in 2024, an increase of 5% compared to 2023. . NBC reports that China as a whole still has the most billionaires overall with 814 in 2024, but the country lost 155 billionaires compared to 2023. . China had a bad year. Wealth creation in China has gone through deep changes these last few years, with the wealth of billionaires from real estate and renewables down, Hurun Research Institute's global rich list report, via NBC. The United States comes in second with 800 billionaires, and India registered a distant third place with 271. The United States comes in second with 800 billionaires, and India registered a distant third place with 271. According to the report, artificial intelligence played a significant role in increasing the number of ultra wealthy people in the U.S. . Whilst [Nvidia CEO] Jensen Huang has grabbed many of the headlines as Nvidia broke through the $2 trillion mark, catapulting him into the Hurun Top 30 as a result, , Hurun Research Institute's global rich list report, via NBC. Whilst [Nvidia CEO] Jensen Huang has grabbed many of the headlines as Nvidia broke through the $2 trillion mark, catapulting him into the Hurun Top 30 as a result, , Hurun Research Institute's global rich list report, via NBC. ... the billionaires behind Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Oracle and Meta have seen significant surges in their wealth as investors bet on the value generated by AI, Hurun Research Institute's global rich list report, via NBC

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
NVIDIA Sued Over AI Copyright Infringement [Video]

NVIDIA Sued Over AI Copyright Infringement

NVIDIA Sued , Over AI Copyright Infringement. Authors have sued NVIDIA over NeMo, the company's AI language model that helps to create and train chatbots, Engadget reports. Authors have sued NVIDIA over NeMo, the company's AI language model that helps to create and train chatbots, Engadget reports. According to authors Abdi Nazemian, Brian Keene and Stewart O'Nan, their books were illegally used to train the AI. They are seeking a jury trial and want NIVIDIA to pay damages and destroy the dataset that powers NeMo's large language models. According to the authors, the Books3 dataset copied Bibliotek, a shadow library containing 196,640 pirated books. In sum, NVIDIA has admitted training its NeMo Megatron models on a copy of The Pile dataset. , Via lawsuit against NVIDIA. Therefore, NVIDIA necessarily also trained its NeMo Megatron models on a copy of Books3, because Books3 is part of The Pile. , Via lawsuit against NVIDIA. Certain books written by Plaintiffs are part of Books3— including the Infringed Works—, Via lawsuit against NVIDIA. ... and thus NVIDIA necessarily trained its NeMo Megatron models on one or more copies of the Infringed Works, thereby directly infringing the copyrights of the Plaintiffs, Via lawsuit against NVIDIA. NVIDIA responded to the suit, telling 'The Wall Street Journal,' "we respect the rights of all content creators and believe we created NeMo in full compliance with copyright law.". OpenAI and Microsoft were hit with a similar lawsuit last year.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Government agency overseeing stock changes

Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision [Video]

Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision

Elon Musk , Loses Appeal of , 'Twitter Sitter' Provision . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . NBC reports that the SEC requirement would require a lawyer to review the Tesla CEO's social media posts. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC deemed the tweets "materially false and misleading," and in clear violation of securities laws. At the time, Musk agreed to settle the issue with the SEC, which included his signing off on the so-called "Twitter sitter" provision. NBC reports that Musk has since said the restrictions are unconstitutional and that he was coerced into signing the SEC agreement. According to court papers, lawyers representing Musk have accused the SEC of waging an "ongoing campaign" against Musk. Musk's legal team claim the provision , "restricts Mr. Musk’s speech even when truthful and accurate.". It extends to speech not covered by the securities laws and with no relation to the conduct underlying the SEC’s civil action, Elon Musk legal team, via NBC. In response, the SEC said in court papers that Musk waived his right to appeal when he signed off on the settlement.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders [Video]

Trump’s Social Media Company Sues Co-Founders

Trump’s Social Media Company , Sues Co-Founders. Trump Media & Technology Group filed a lawsuit against co-founders Wesley Moss and Andrew Litinsky on March 24, ABC News reports. The suit came two days before shareholders approved a merger that allowed the company to begin trading on the Nasdaq. The lawsuit alleges that the two men "failed spectacularly" to lead the company and made "reckless and wasteful decisions" that resulted in "significant damage.". Trump Media wants the co-founders to give up their shares of the company, among other things. . TMTG has been forced to file this action to remedy the harm inflicted upon it by two faithless fiduciaries and a company they own -- Wesley Moss, Andrew Litinsky, and [United Atlantic Ventures] -- and to halt their ongoing attempts to do even more damage, Via lawsuit. Moss and Litinsky's company, United Atlantic Ventures, owns 5.5% of Trump Media, according to the SEC. That amounts to 7,525,000 shares which are worth about $388 million. Donald Trump's stake in the company is currently valued at over $4 billion. Since going public last week, the stock has been very volatile. . At one time, shares peaked over $79. On April 1, they plunged by 21%. Shares recovered slightly on April 2

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:30Published
SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities [Video]

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase for Offering Unregistered Securities

SEC Permitted to Sue Coinbase , for Offering Unregistered Securities. U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla has ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) lawsuit against Coinbase can proceed, The Verge reports. . The SEC has sufficiently pleaded that Coinbase operates as an exchange, as a broker, and as a clearing agency under the federal securities laws, , U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. ... and, through its Staking Program, engages in the unregistered offer and sale of securities, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto. . The judge rejected arguments that existing laws are inadequate when it comes to crypto. . The ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, via ruling. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling. . Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal took to X to respond to the ruling. . Early motions like ours against a government agency are almost always denied. , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. But clarity is the ultimate goal and today’s decision continues us on that path, Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. Looking ahead, we remain confident in our legal arguments, we look forward to proving we’re right, , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X. ... we are eager for the opportunity to take discovery from the SEC for the first time, and we appreciate the Court’s continued consideration of our case. , Paul Grewal, Coinbase chief legal officer, via X

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published
SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits [Video]

SEC's New Climate Disclosure Rules Facing Multiple Lawsuits

SEC's New , Climate Disclosure Rules , Facing Multiple Lawsuits. 'Newsweek' reports that both industry and environmental groups have legally challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission over new rules. . The new rules require some businesses to disclose information about climate risks, including direct greenhouse gas emissions and risks from extreme weather. The SEC rules, which were approved on March 6 by a 3-2 vote, also require companies to provide investors with context on how those companies plan on managing those risks. Some requirements were pared back prior to the rules being approved. Those rules include reporting on Scope 3 emissions which relate to the company's supply chain. In response to the new rules, two fossil fuel producing companies filed lawsuits accusing the SEC of burdening companies and exposing them to potential litigation. 19 state attorney generals have also filed lawsuits claiming that the new rules exceed the SEC's legal authority. On the other side, environmental groups the Sierra Club Foundation and Earthjustice announced their own lawsuits accusing the SEC of watering down rules to protect investors. Sierra Club has millions of members and supporters who have investments in the market. It's really critical that we have access to information about climate risks that may be faced by the kinds of entities that we would hope to invest in, Andres Restrepo, Sierra Club Senior Attorney, via Newsweek. 'Newsweek' reports that the SEC rules were meant to take effect in 2026, however, the legal challenges are likely to result in delays. The new rules come as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated plans to restrict the regulatory authority of environmental enforcement agencies.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published