India  

My statement is being twisted: Misa Bharti clarifies her remark on PM Modi

IndiaTimes Friday, 12 April 2024 ()
Alleging that her statement was twisted, the RJD leader said to the media, "I made a remark on the verdict of Supreme Court on electoral bonds. I said that if our government comes to power, we will conduct an inquiry and punish the accused. My statement is being twisted."
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 

πŸ’‘ newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Rashtriya Janata Dal Rashtriya Janata Dal Political party in India

Congress can't rob OBCs of their quota right if Modi is there: PM

Modi criticizes Congress, RJD, and INDIA bloc for EVM confusion. Mentions OBC quota manipulation, Muslim appeasement, and inheritance tax plans. Discusses..
IndiaTimes

'Bihar was converted into 'jungle raj' under Lalu-Rabri govt': Amit Shah

Amit Shah condemns RJD for 'Jungle Raj', praises PM Modi for addressing societal issues, including 'parivarvaad' and casteism. He highlights BJP's initiatives..
IndiaTimes

NDA's lone Muslim Bihar MP Mehboob Ali Kaiser joins RJD

​​​​He officially joined the RJD in the presence of party leader Tejashwi Yadav. ​​"Kaiser-saheb is joining us after a meeting with party president..
IndiaTimes

Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States

Relief for WB mantris but SC refuses to stay HC order to sack 25,000 teachers

On Monday, the Supreme Court did not halt the Calcutta High Court's decision to invalidate the appointment of over 25,000 teachers in West Bengal. However, it..
IndiaTimes

Do you want to protect accused in Sandeshkhali case: SC to Bengal

On Monday, the Supreme Court questioned the West Bengal government for challenging the Calcutta High Court's order for a CBI investigation into allegations of..
IndiaTimes
Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision [Video]

Elon Musk Loses Appeal of 'Twitter Sitter' Provision

Elon Musk , Loses Appeal of , 'Twitter Sitter' Provision . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . On April 29, the Supreme Court denied billionaire Elon Musk's challenge to the terms of a Securities and Exchange Commission agreement. . NBC reports that the SEC requirement would require a lawyer to review the Tesla CEO's social media posts. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . In his appeal, Musk argued that the SEC's requirement, which has been dubbed the 'Twitter sitter' provision, unlawfully imposed conditions on his freedom to comment. . The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC requirement stems from Musk's tweets in 2018 that claimed he was taking Tesla private, which shocked the market and caused shares in the company to surge. The SEC deemed the tweets "materially false and misleading," and in clear violation of securities laws. At the time, Musk agreed to settle the issue with the SEC, which included his signing off on the so-called "Twitter sitter" provision. NBC reports that Musk has since said the restrictions are unconstitutional and that he was coerced into signing the SEC agreement. According to court papers, lawyers representing Musk have accused the SEC of waging an "ongoing campaign" against Musk. Musk's legal team claim the provision , "restricts Mr. Musk’s speech even when truthful and accurate.". It extends to speech not covered by the securities laws and with no relation to the conduct underlying the SEC’s civil action, Elon Musk legal team, via NBC. In response, the SEC said in court papers that Musk waived his right to appeal when he signed off on the settlement.

Credit: Wibbitz Top Stories    Duration: 01:31Published

Baba Ramdev crossed red line with false claims of curing Covid, calling modern medicine 'stupid': IMA president

Baba Ramdev crossed a red line when he claimed he could cure Covid-19 and at the same time maligned modern medicine by calling it a "stupid and bankrupt..
IndiaTimes

Supreme Court agrees to consider plea seeking declaration Sharia won’t apply to ex-Muslims

The Supreme Court issued notice on a writ petition seeking exemption from Shariat law for ex-Muslims. The plea, filed by Safiya PM from Kerala, argues for..
IndiaTimes

You Might Like


Related news from verified sources

Supreme Court to examine whether complainants/victims should get chargesheets

Supreme Court considers providing chargesheets to complainants in criminal cases. Petitioner seeks free supply after Delhi court rejection. CrPC allows victim...
IndiaTimes

United States: Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture-for-Competition Provision In Limited Partnership Agreement - Mayer Brown

On January 29, 2024, in Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Ainslie, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Chancery Court holding that a forfeiture-for-competition...
Mondaq

India: Supreme Court: Nomination Process Under Companies Act Does Not Override Succession Laws - Argus Partners

The Supreme Court recently in Shakti Yezdani v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, (Judgment dated December 14, 2023 in Civil Appeal No. 7107 of 2017) held that the...
Mondaq