India  

The case from 1720 that CJI D Y Chandrachud highlighted to underscore the importance of following the rule of law

IndiaTimes Tuesday, 2 July 2024
0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 

You Might Like


💡 newsR Knowledge: Other News Mentions

Chief Justice of India Chief Justice of India Presiding judge of the Supreme Court of India

SC agrees to hear Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad's PIL against arrest for remarks on Operation Sindoor

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition from Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, arrested by Haryana Police for his remarks on Operation..
IndiaTimes

Maharashtra chief secretary, DGP apologise for protocol lapse at CJI event

The Chief Justice of India's inaugural visit to Mumbai encountered unexpected protocol issues. The CJI noted the absence of key state officials upon his arrival...
IndiaTimes

Constitution is supreme, all its wings must work together: CJI

CJI Bhushan Gavai emphasized the Constitution's supremacy, stating that all three branches—judiciary, executive, and legislature—must collaborate within its..
IndiaTimes

CJI BR Gavai issues BIG statement days after taking oath, says 'Constitution of India...'

Chief Justice of India BR Gavai on Sunday stressed that neither the judiciary nor the executive, but the Constitution of India was supreme and its pillars must..
DNA

Related news from verified sources

The case from 1720 that CJI D Y Chandrachud highlighted to underscore the importance of following the rule of law


IndiaTimes Also reported by •Zee News

'Non-biological PM and biological minister add proof to their incompetence': Congress slams Centre over postponement of NEET-UG counselling

Congress criticized the government over NEET-UG counselling delay. Jairam Ramesh condemned the 'non-biological PM' and Education Minister's insensitivity. The...
IndiaTimes

NEET-UG 2024 hearing live updates: 'Re-exam can only be ordered if...,' says CJI

NEET-UG 2024: Re-examination has to be on concrete footing that sanctity of entire test was affected, says SC.
DNA