SC on Delhi HC ruling: Should courts be so touchy about criticism?
Friday, 4 April 2025
The Supreme Court questioned the Delhi high court's order urging Wikimedia to remove a page criticizing judiciary proceedings. The bench stated such removal orders should only be issued if content is deemed contemptuous, not merely critical. Wikimedia opposed the HC order, emphasizing its importance for media freedom, referencing a defamation case by ANI. The page is already removed.
|
||||
|
|
||||
You Might Likeπ‘ newsR Knowledge: Other News MentionsDelhi High Court High Court for NCT of Delhi'Udaipur Files' row: Govt recommends 6 changes, stalls release till SC hearing; seeks removal of Nutan Sharma name, execution sceneThe Central government has suggested six modifications to the film 'Udaipur Files,' following a Delhi High Court directive. These include changes to an..IndiaTimes Wipro to pay 2 lakh to ex-staffer for βdefamatoryβ relieving letterDelhi High Court instructed Wipro to pay Rupees Two Lakh to an ex-employee. This was due to defamatory comments in the relieving letter. The court ordered Wipro..IndiaTimes No relief for Lalu Yadav in 'Land-for-jobs' case: SC refuses to stay plea; directs Delhi HC to expedite hearingThe Supreme Court has refused to halt trial court proceedings against Lalu Prasad Yadav in the CBI's land-for-jobs case. Yadav's appeal followed the Delhi High..IndiaTimes Lalu Yadav moves SC: Dismissal of proceedings sought in land-for-Job case; hearing on July 18Lalu Prasad Yadav has approached the Supreme Court. This action follows the Delhi High Court's rejection of his request. He sought a stay on proceedings in the..IndiaTimes Supreme Court to hear plea for 'Udaipur Files' release 'in a day or two'The Supreme Court has assured the producers of 'Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder' that it will promptly hear their plea against the Delhi High Court's..IndiaTimes
|
||||
